Innate Lymphoid Cells, their Biological Characteristic and Role in Immunopathological Processes

Milan BUC

Institute of Immunology, Comenius University Faculty of Medicine, Bratislava, Slovakia


Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are among the most recently identified cell populations that contribute to immune responses. ILCs lack antigen-specific receptors that characterise T and B lymphocytes. In contrast to cells of adaptive immunity, ILCs lack somatic rearrangement of antigen-specific receptors and do not express T-cell or B-cell receptors (TCRs or BCRs). ILCs arise from hematopoietic common lymphoid progenitors in the bone marrow; however, full ILC maturation occurs in non-lymphoid tissues, where immature ILCs take up residence. ILCs are under-represented in lymphoid tissues, but parenchymal tissues, especially mucosal surfaces, show substantial enrichment for ILCs. In the mucosa of the intestine and lungs, ILCs seem to be particularly important regulators of epithelial barriers. Because of their strategic location, ILCs are among the first immune cells to respond to pathogens, inducing infection-related responses and shaping the adaptive immune response. Innate lymphoid cells are divided into three groups, ILC1, ILC2, and ILC3, each of which performs specific functions and cooperates with other cells of the immune system, thereby supporting immune defence and homeostasis. ILC cells also contribute to the inflammation and tissue damage in some diseases by producing cytokines that drive inflammatory responses.


Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) belong to a recently identified population of immune system cells that contribute to the body’s defences. They originate from a common lymphoid progenitor (CLP) in the bone marrow, leave the bone marrow as immature cells, and mature in peripheral tissues. They are found in all tissues, but are most abundant in the skin, respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts, and are relatively few in peripheral blood. Morphologically, they resemble B and T lymphocytes but lack their antigen-specific receptors. The second significant difference between lymphocytes of adaptive immunity is that they are not activated in peripheral lymphoid organs and subsequently do not migrate to tissues and organs. On the contrary, they are primarily localised there and respond to stimuli immediately, rather than after clonal expansion. They are not activated by antigen-presenting cells, but rather by a variety of stimuli, including cytokines, alarmins, lipids, and hormones released by stromal, epithelial, and myeloid lineage cells. Thus, ILCs are physically and functionally primed to serve as immediate sources of cytokines in peripheral tissues, alongside other rapidly responding cells residing there, such as NKT cells, γδ T cells, and resident memory T cells. The minimal requirements for their activation enable them to serve as first responders in the early phases of the primary immune response and to produce cytokines in response to subtle perturbations of homeostatic processes1,2. In 1987, Mosmann and Coffman identified the TH1 and TH2 subpopulations of helper T lymphocytes3,4. Two decades later, in 2005, another subpopulation, TH17, was added5,6, followed by the discovery of three others. Later, when innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) emerged, it was found, quite surprisingly, that these new cells had properties similar to those of TH lymphocyte subpopulations, especially in production of their cytokines (Table 1). This allowed them to be divided into distinct populations, also based on their different cytokine synthesis and function. So, nowadays we recognise three groups: ILC1, ILC2, and ILC3. These resemble polarised subpopulations of T helper lymphocytes. Thus, ILC1 cells functionally resemble TH1, ILC2 cells resemble TH2, and ILC3 cells resemble TH17 lymphocytes. Similarly, they utilise the same transcription factors for differentiation as polarised TH lymphocytes: T-bet (ILC1), GATA3 (ILC2), and RORγt (ILC3)7,8 (Fig. 1). Experimental results indicate that ILC cells play a redundant role in a fully functional adaptive immune system in humans. The question arises as to why such functional redundancy exists. On the one hand, the organism may benefit from this in the form of an increased immune response and faster elimination of the intruder as the hallmark of ILCs is prompt, antigen-independent activation. Also, sometimes it is sufficient for ILC cells to respond on their own, without the help of TH lymphocytes, thereby preventing excessive activation and the subsequent development of autoimmune processes 9,10.

JIS-26-1268-fig1

Figure 1: Differentiation of innate lymphoid cells (modified according to Yao et al. 202528)

ILCs originate from lymphoid progenitors CLPs (common lymphoid progenitors). They give rise to CILPs (common innate lymphoid progenitors), which serve as the earliest precursors within the ILC lineage. CILPs differentiate to CHILP lineage (common helper lymphoid progenitors), giving rise to NK (natural killer cells), LTis (lymphoid tissue inducers) cells and ILCPs (innate lymphoid cell precursor). ILCPs differentiate further into ILC1s, ILC2s, and ILC3s with distinct functions.

Table 1: Cytokines produced by subpopulations of T helper lymphocytes

Cytokine

TH1

TH2

TH17

TH9

TH22

TFH

IFN-g

++

-

-

-

-

-

IL-2

++

-

-

-

-

-

TNF

++

+

+*

-

-

-

IL-4

-

++

-

-

-

+

IL-5

-

++

-

-

-

-

IL-6

-

-

+

-

-

-

IL-13

-

++

-

-

-

-

IL-9

-

+

-

++

-

-

IL-10

+

++

+

++

+

-

IL-17

-

-

++

-

-

-

IL-21

-

-

+

-

-

+

IL-22

-

-

+

-

++

-

*Not typically, but they can produce it under specific circumstances

Modified according to common textbooks

Populations of ILC cells and their physiological properties

The ILC1 group includes ILC1 cells and natural killer (NK) cells. NK cells were among the first cells to be characterised as ILCs; they were discovered 50 years ago11,12. However, some authors object to their inclusion in the ILC1 group, considering them an independent population13,14. ILC1 cells, unlike NK cells, are not cytotoxic and produce substantial amounts of IFN-γ and TNF. We can also distinguish them based on the expression of the transcription factors T-bet and EOMES. While NK cells express both, ILC1 cells only express T-bet. Moreover, ILC1 cells express CD127 (alpha receptor for IL-7; IL-7Rα), whereas NK cells do not. Another difference is that while NK cells recirculate, ILC1 cells, like other ILC cells, are sessile, meaning they dwell in tissues and renew themselves through self-replication rather than deriving from ILC1 cells in the blood or their precursors in the bone marrow. Another characteristic marker of ILC1 cells is CD103, an integrin protein7,14 (Table 2). ILC1 cells are not a uniform population. We recognise subsets present in the intestinal mucosa, liver, salivary glands and female reproductive tract. Moreover, ILC1 cells can arise by transdifferentiation of ILC2 and ILC3 cells8.

Table 2: Basic characteristics of ILC cells

ILC1 subset

 

NK cells

Eomes, T-bet, NKp80, CD16, CD45, CD56, CD294, KIR, IFN-g

ILC1 cells

T-bet, NKp46, CD45, CD90, CD103, CD127, CD49a, IFN-g

ILC2 subset

RORα, GATA3, TSLP, NKp30, CRTH2, CD25, CD45, CD127, ICOS, IL-17RB, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-13, amphiregulin

ILC3 subset

 

LTi cells

RORgt, LTα1β2, CD45, CD127, CD252, CXCR5, CCR6, CCR7

NCR+ (ILC22)

RORgt, AHR, NKp44, CD45, CD127, CD161, IL-22

NCR+ (ILC17)

RORgt, AHR, CCR6, CD45, CD161, IL-17

ILCreg subset

 

ILCreg

CD45, CD127, CD90, CD25, IL-10

The physiological role of ILC1 cells is to combat certain bacteria and parasites (Clostridium difficile, Salmonella enterica, Toxoplasma gondii) and to participate in immune surveillance of malignant processes, although distinguishing ILC1 cell participation from that of NK cells in individual cases remains challenging13,14.

The ILC2 group is characterised by activation by IL-33, IL-25, or TSLP, which are produced by macrophages, mast cells, and NKT cells at the beginning of the immune response, or by epithelial cells when they are damaged (hence they are also referred to as epithelial cytokines). After activation, they begin producing typical TH2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-9) and amphiregulin. ILC2 cells also express class II HLA molecules, which allows them to participate in adaptive immune mechanisms. In contrast to groups 1 and 3 ILCs, no functional subpopulations of ILC2 cells have been identified in healthy individuals14,15. Under physiological conditions, ILC2 cells primarily function to fight helminths. When they invade the gut, tuft cells are among the first to sense their presence and start producing IL-25. It stimulates ILC2 cells to produce IL-13, which subsequently induces tuft cell hyperplasia, thereby increasing IL-25 synthesis and activating ILC2 cells. Another amplification mechanism for the early activation of ILC2 cells involves IL-9 production by ILC2 cells themselves. It acts autocrinally, activating them. Activated ILC2 cells synthesise IL-5, IL-13 and amphiregulin. IL-5 is a growth and activation factor for eosinophils, while amphiregulin maintains epithelial cell homeostasis. IL-13 induces smooth muscle contraction, mucus production by goblet cells and the attraction of M2 macrophages. All these factors contribute to the expulsion of worms from the intestine (a process referred to as “weep-and-sweep reaction”)16,17. ILC2 cells play a significant role in the development of type I hypersensitivity reactions. They contribute to their development by producing type 2 cytokines, including IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, and IL-13, which are crucial in promoting the type 2 immune response, characterised by the activation of mast cells, eosinophils, and basophils. IL-4 and IL-13 promote B cell class switching to produce IgE antibodies. They bind to the FcεRI receptors on mast cells, sensitising them to allergens. Upon re-exposure to the allergen, the sensitised mast cells degranulate, releasing histamine and other inflammatory mediators. The cytokines produced by ILC2s further amplify this inflammatory response, leading to the symptoms associated with allergic reactions. By producing IL-5, they recruit and activate eosinophils, which substantially contribute to tissue damage and inflammation18,19. ILC2 cells also play important roles in limiting tissue damage after infection by producing ligands for the epithelial growth factor receptor, such as amphiregulin. It has been shown to control the proliferation and differentiation of epithelial cells, which are required for epithelial repair following influenza infection20,21. This property of ILC2 cells supports the hypothesis that the type 2 immune response (Box 1) evolved to repair damaged tissues and protect against harmful xenobiotics. It suggests that ILC2 cells maintain mucosal barriers under continuous exposure to environmental allergens, remaining fully functional by initiating a low-grade type 2 immune response, including mucus production and tissue repair. Based on the above, we can infer that ILC2 cells may protect us from the development of an allergic response mediated by the adaptive immune system by providing the first line of defence against allergens21,22.

Box 1 Types of immune responses

JIS-26-1268-box1

The ILC3 group is characterised by CCR6 expression and is divided into three subpopulations. The first one includes lymphoid tissue inducer cells (LTi), which, like NK cells, were discovered before ILC2 and ILC3 cells. LTi cells play a crucial role in the formation of lymph nodes during embryogenesis and are also important for the development of intestinal lymphoid structures in the postnatal gut. They express the lymphotoxin heterotrimer (LTα1β2) in their membranes. After lymphotoxin beta (LTβ) binds to their receptor on stromal cells, it induces the synthesis of chemokines in them, which attract lymphocytes to form secondary lymphoid organs, namely lymph nodes, Peyer’s patches and isolated lymphoid follicles (but not the spleen or nasal associated lymphoid tissue - (NALT)2,4,8 Some authors distinguish LTi cells, like NK cells, from the group of ILC3 or ILC1 cells, respectively and classify them as a separate population that develops from different precursors8,10 (Fig. 1). The second and the third subpopulations differ in their production of IL-22 and expression of NKp44 receptor. If they produce their principal cytokine IL22 and express NKp44, they are referred to as ILC22 cells. If they are characterised by significant IL-17 synthesis and are NKp44-negative, they are referred to as ILC17. IL-22 promotes the synthesis of antibacterial substances and promotes the proliferation of epithelial cells. IL-17, by activating neutrophils, is involved in antibacterial immunity in the skin and mucous membranes13. The physiological and pathological function of ILC cells is schematically shown in Fig. 2.

JIS-26-1268-fig2

Figure 2: Physiological and pathological functions of ILC cells

After stimulation, ILC cells release their characteristic cytokines, which ensure their physiological functions, i.e. in fighting intracellular pathogens, parasites and extracellular pathogens, or participate in their repair, whether during self-renewal or after damage. However, excessive production of their cytokines during inflammation determines their participation in the development of autoimmune diseases (ILC1 and ILC3 cells), or in the development of allergic processes, especially in bronchial asthma (ILC2 cells).

Legend: IBD – inflammatory bowel disease, MS – multiple sclerosis, PsV – psoriasis vulgaris, RA – rheumatoid arthritis

Recently, regulatory innate lymphoid cells (ILCreg) have been added to the growing family of regulatory cells, which includes tTreg, pTreg, Tr-1, Tr35, TH3, and Breg cells25,26. Unlike ILC1s, ILC2s, and ILC3s, ILCreg cells originate from the common helper-like innate lymphoid precursor (CHILP) (Fig. 1) and express Id3 (inhibitor of DNA binding)3, which is required for their development and maintenance. This CD127+CD90+CD25+ population was detected in the small and large intestines and produces IL-10. However, regulatory ILCs fail to express the transcription factor FOXP3 as tTreg cells do. The biological role of regulatory ILCs remains unclear, but these cells appear to have a potent capacity to suppress intestinal inflammatory responses in vivo27,28.

At the very end, one can ask why ILC cells evolved when T lymphocytes already perform the same functions? The answer can be based on the following facts: 1. Early defence: ILCs provide a first line of defence before the adaptive immune system is activated. This is especially important in mucosal tissues through which pathogens often enter. 2. Tissue homeostasis: ILCs help maintain barrier integrity and promote tissue repair − functions that go beyond pathogen defence. 3. Developmental flexibility: Some ILCs may even arise from thymic progenitors, suggesting a shared lineage with T cells but a divergent functional path. 4. Because of speed matters. In evolutionary terms, organisms that could mount a quick response to infection had a survival edge. 5. ILCs also operate in environments where antigen presentation is limited, making their innate responsiveness essential1,2,29.

References

  1. Walker JA, Jillian L, Barlow JL, McKenzie ANJ. 2013. Innate lymphoid cells – how did we miss them? Nat Rev Immunol 13(2): 75–87.
  2. Vivier E, Artis D, Colonna M et al. 2018. Innate lymphoid cells: 10 years on. Cell 174 3(5): 1054–66.
  3. Mosmann TR, Coffman, RL. 1987. Two types of mouse helper T-cell clones. Implications for immune regulation. Immunol Today 8(7-8): 223–7.
  4. Mosmann TR, Coffman RL. 1989. Th1 and Th2 cells: Different patterns of lymphokine functional properties. Annu Rev Immunol 7: 145–73.
  5. Harrington LE, Hatton RD, Mangan PR et al. 2005. Interleukin 17-producing CD4⁺ effector T cells develop via a lineage distinct from the T helper type 1 and 2 lineages. Nat Immunol 6(11): 1123–32.
  6. Park H, Li Z, Yang XO et al. 2005. A distinct lineage of CD4 T cells regulates tissue inflammation by producing interleukin-17. Nat Immunol 6(11): 1133–41.
  7. Artis D, Spits H. 2015. The biology of innate lymphoid cells. Nature 517(7534): 293– 301.
  8. Colonna M. 2018. Innate lymphoid cells: diversity, plasticity and unique functions in immunity. Immunity 48(6): 1104–17.
  9. Vély F, Barlogis V, Vallentin B et al. 2016. Evidence of innate lymphoid cell redundancy in humans. Nat Immunol 17(11): 1291–99.
  10. Eberl G, Colonna M, Di Santo JP, McKenzie AN. 2015. Innate lymphoid cells: a new paradigm in immunology. Science 348(6237): aaa6566.
  11. Herberman RB, Nunn ME, Holden HT, Lavrin DH. 1975. Natural cytotoxic reactivity of mouse lymphoid cells against syngeneic and allogeneic tumours. Int J Cancer 16: 216–29.
  12. Rosenberg EB, McCoy JL, Green SS et al. 1974. Destruction of human lymphoid tissue-culture peripheral cell lines by human peripheral lymphocytes in 51Cr-release cellular cytotoxicity assays. J Natl Cancer Inst 52(2): 345–52.
  13. Spits H, Jochem H, Bernink JH, Lanier L. 2016. NK cells and type 1 innate lymphoid cells: partners in host defence. Nat Immunol 17(7): 758–66.
  14. Simoni Y, Newell EW. 2018. Dissecting human ILC heterogeneity: more than just three subsets. Immunology 153(3): 297–303.
  15. Oliphant CJ, Hwang YY, Walker JA et al. 2014. MHCII-mediated dialogue between group 2 innate lymphoid cells and CD4(+) T cells potentiates type 2 immunity and promotes expulsion of parasitic helminths. Immunity 41(2): 283–95.
  16. von Moltke J, Ji M, Liang HE, Locksley RM. 2016. Tuft-cell-derived IL-25 regulates an intestinal ILC2-epithelial response circuit. Nature 529(2): 221–5.
  17. Gerbe F, Sidot E, Smyth DJ et al. 2016. Intestinal epithelial tuft cells initiate type 2 mucosal immunity to helminth parasites. Nature 529(7585): 226–30.
  18. Kato A. 2919. Group 2 innate lymphoid cells in airway diseases. Chest; 156(1): 14−49.
  19. Jutel M, Agache I, Zemelka-Wiacek M et al. 2023. Nomenclature of allergic diseases and hypersensitivity reactions: Adapted to modern needs: An EAACI position paper. Allergy 78(7585): 2851–74.
  20. Monticelli LA, Sonnenberg GF, Abt MC et al. 2011. Innate lymphoid cells promote lung tissue homeostasis after influenza virus infection. Nat Immunol 12(11): 1045–54.
  21. Akdis CA, Arkwright PD, Brüggen MC et al. 2020. Type 2 immunity in the skin and lungs. Allergy 75(7): 1582–1605.
  22. Mathä L, Martinez-Gonzalez I, Steer CA, Take F. 2021. The Fate of Activated Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells. 12. Article 671966: 1–11.
  23. Annunziato F, Romagnani C, Romagnani S. 2015. The 3 major types of innate and adaptive cell-mediated effector immunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 135(3): 626–35.
  24. Hazenberg MD, Spits H. 2014. Human innate lymphoid cells. Blood 124(5): 700–9.
  25. Buc M. 2024. Regulatory lymphocyte club: mechanisms of action, role in autoimmunity and allergy, promising therapeutic applications. Lek Obz 73(11): 410–14.
  26. Thomas ChM, Peebles RS. 2022. Development and function of regulatory innate lymphoid cells. Front Immunol 13: 1014774.
  27. Wang S, Xia P, Chen Y et al. 2017. Regulatory innate lymphoid cells control innate intestinal inflammation. Cell 171(1): 201–16.
  28. Yao X, Ma K, Zhu Y, Siyan Cao S. 2025. Innate lymphoid cells in inflammatory bowel disease. Cells 14 (11): 825 – 51.
  29. Shin SB, McNagny KM. 2021. ILC-You in the thymus: A fresh look at innate lymphoid cell development. Front Immunol 2021. Article 681110.
 

Article Info

Article Notes

  • Published on: June 30, 2026

Keywords

  • ILC Cells
  • Subpopulations of ILC Cells
  • NK Cells
  • LTi Cells
  • T Lymphocyte Subpopulations
  • Types of Immune Reactions
  • Allergy
  • Helminths

*Correspondence:

Prof. Milan BUC,
Institute of Immunology, Comenius University Faculty of Medicine, Bratislava, Slovakia;
Email: milanbuc@hotmail.com; milan.buc@fmed.uniba.sk

Copyright: ©2026 BUC M. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.