Shining Gold Nanostars: From Cancer Diagnostics to Photothermal Treatment and Immunotherapy

Tuan Vo-Dinh*1, Yang Liu1, Bridget M Crawford1, Hsin-Neng Wang1, Hsiangkuo Yuan1, Janna K Register1, Christopher G Khoury1

1Fitzpatrick Institute for Photonics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0281, USA


Cancer has been a significant threat to human health with more than eight million deaths each year in the world. There is an urgent need to develop novel methods to improve cancer management. Biocompatible gold nanostars (GNS) with tip-enhanced electromagnetic and optical properties have been developed and applied for multifunctional cancer diagnostics and therapy (theranostics). The GNS platform can be used for multiple sensing, imaging and treatment modalities, such as surface-enhanced Raman scattering, two-photon photoluminescence, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography as well as photothermal therapy and immunotherapy. GNS-mediated photothermal therapy combined with checkpoint immunotherapy has been found to reverse tumor-mediated immunosuppression, leading to the treatment of not only primary tumors but also cancer metastasis as well as inducing effective long-lasting immunity, i.e. an anticancer ‘vaccine’ effect.


Over the past few decades nanotechnology has contributed to significant advances in medicine. In particular, the use of nanoparticles has attracted great interest due to their unique efficacy and specificity in imaging, diagnostics and therapy. This article provides an overview of the research and development and applications of plasmonic nanoplatforms such as gold nanostars (GNS) developed in our laboratory for use in bioimaging, photothermal therapy (PTT) and immunotherapy. Gold nanostars provide an excellent diagnostic and therapeutic (theranostics) platform having multi-modality capability spanning surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), two-photon photoluminescence imaging, photodynamic therapy, photothermal therapy, and immunotherapy. The enhanced permeability and retention feature and the capacity to efficiently convert photon energy into heat, make GNS the ideal photothermal transducer for selective cancer therapy at the nanoscale level as recently demonstrated by our group both in vitro and in vivo experiments. The use of GNS-mediated PTT in combination with immunotherapy can broaden and enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. The combination therapy not only eradicates primary ‘treated’ tumors but also results in the immune-mediated destruction of distant ‘untreated’ metastatic tumors and creates an anticancer ‘vaccine’ effect.

A special type of metallic nanoparticles, called “plasmonic” nanoparticles exhibits enhanced optical and electromagnetic properties. The term “plasmonics” is derived from the word plasmon, which refers to oscillations of conduction electrons in metallic nanostructures under the excitation light (e.g., laser) that irradiates the surface. These oscillations of electrons on the surface, called a “surface plasmon”, produce intense electromagnetic (EM) fields, leading to enormous increase in Raman scattering by 6-8 orders of magnitude. Raman spectroscopy is a sensing modality that allows for the optical detection of molecular and vibrational spectral information. This spectral “fingerprint” consists of very sharp peaks that can be easily distinguished from other targets allowing for the capability of sensing multiple targets simultaneously- or “multiplexing”. The plasmonic effect leads to a technique called surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)1. Theoretical studies and numerical simulations have shown intense electromagnetic field enhancement in a wide variety of plasmonic structures2-8. The development of these plasmonic nanoplatforms has led to a wide variety of applications ranging from chemical sensing8-10 to biomonitoring of nucleic acid biomarkers such as DNAs, mRNAs, and microRNAs, which have demonstrated great promise as a novel class of biomarkers for early detection of various cancers11-17.

Among plasmonic nanoparticles (e.g., gold nanospheres), gold nanostars (GNS) are of particular interest as they offer optical tunability by engineering subtle changes in their geometry. The multiple sharp branches on GNS create a “lightning rod” effect that enhances the local EM field dramatically (Fig. 1), leading to intense SERS signals for sensitive sensing and bioimaging. The intense EM enhancement produces strong light absorption by GNS and effective energy conversion for heating of tumor cells in nanoparticle-mediated photothermal therapy studies19,20. The large field enhancement at the tips of the star is due to a combination of the resonance enhancement and the “lighting-rod effect” associated with the large curvature at the tips. This curvature creates a larger surface charge density and consequently a higher electric field. As a result, nanostars can generate E-field “hot spots” that can greatly exceed the enhancement of smoother particles such as nanospheres. We have introduced a novel surfactant-free synthesis method that does not require toxic surfactant for producing biocompatible GNS suitable for in vivo applications. The synthesis method for GNS requires no addition of a toxic polymer surfactant, e.g., cetyl-trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), rendering the GNS biocompatible and surface functionalizable. These features are important for in vivo biomedical applications21. In contrast to other NPs that requires hours of elaborate chemical processes, our high-yield AuNS synthesis method is simple and takes less than 30 seconds to complete. GNS optical properties can be engineered by making subtle changes in their synthesis chemistry that results in geometry changes that can tune their peak absorption band into the near infrared (NIR) spectral range (700-1200 nm)21,22, often referred to as the ‘diagnostic and therapeutic’ optical window, where photons travel further in tissue for sensing and therapy.

JISS-17-1104-Fig1

Figure 1: (Top) Transmission electron microscopy image of gold nanostars (GNS) having different branch numbers. Scale bar 50 nm; (Bottom) 3D modeling and simulation of |E| in the vicinity of the nanostars in response to a z-polarized plane wave incident E-field of unit amplitude, propagating in the y-direction, and with a wavelength of 800 nm. The GNS’ structure has multiple sharp branches that produce the numerous curvatures responsible for the ‘lightning rod’ effect that strongly enhances the local electromagnetic field when subject to light stimulation. The calculations indicate that the electromagnetic (EM) field at the GNS tips is dramatically enhanced, which reflects an intense tip-enhanced plasmonic effect. The insets depict the 3D geometry of the stars. Diagrams are not to scale. (Adapted from Reference 20)

We have developed a new “Off-to-On” detection scheme referred to as the “Inverse Molecular Sentinel” (iMS) nanoprobes, which combines the nucleic acid competitive strand-displacement for target recognition and binding and the plasmonic effect for sensitive SERS detection (Fig. 2)17 MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have demonstrated great promise as a novel class of biomarkers for early detection of various cancers, including breast cancer. However, due to technical difficulties in detecting these small molecules, miRNAs have not been adopted into routine clinical practice for early diagnostics. Thus, it is important to develop alternative detection strategies that could offer more advantages over conventional methods. We have applied the iMS nanoprobe diagnostics technology to detect microRNA biomarkers for early cancer diagnostics18.

JISS-17-1104-Fig2

Figure 2: Operating principle of the “Inverse Molecular Sentinel” nanoprobe for detection of nucleic acid biomarkers of disease. Without target, the probe is “open” with low SERS signal: OFF state. Upon binding to nuclear acid target (e.g., DNA, mRNA, miRNA), the placeholder strand leaves the nanoparticle (GNS) following a strand-displacement process. The stem-loop closes, moving the Raman label onto the plasmonic nanoparticle (Adapted from Ref. 17)

Plasmonics-enhanced and optically modulated delivery of nanostars into brain tumors in live animals was demonstrated23,24. The imaging method of GNS using two-photon photoluminescence (TPL), a method that combines energies of two photons in the near infrared (NIR) to induce luminescence of molecules in the visible range, provided an unprecedented spatial selectivity for enhanced targeted nanostar delivery to cortical tumor tissue. Because of the extremely high intensity of TPL emission from GNS, tracking the motion of GNS in the blood vessel can be observed in real-time24. A quintuple-modality nanoreporters based on GNS for SERS, TPL, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and photothermal therapy (PTT) have been developed25. Intense TPL signals have allowed the study of GNS uptake mechanisms in vitro to track GNS in real-time and to assess the intratumor GNS distribution in vivo23,26.

SERS measurements have also been used for sensing GNS probes in living animals26,27. In addition to SERS, GNS also exhibit strong TPL emission and can be used to monitor nanoparticle distribution at the cellular level without dye labeling. Furthermore GNS have been use as contrast agents for CT imaging utilizing the strong absorption characteristics of the nanoparticles to enhance the contrast of the detected x-ray image19. Gold nanostars that were injected intravenously into mice having sarcoma tumors exhibited intense SERS signals due to the strong local field enhancement at the tips of the nanostar spikes19. GNS sizes can be controlled so that they passively accumulate in tumors due to the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect of tumor vasculature. The EPR effect is due to the inherent leakiness of the underdeveloped tumor vasculature, which allows nanoparticles to escape the circulation and accumulate passively in tumors. Also retention of nanoparticles in the tumor is enhanced due to the inefficient lymphatic system, which would normally carry extravasated fluid back to the circulation. Nanoparticles must be designed to have a narrow size range between approximately 10 and 100 nm to take advantage of the EPR effect. Nanoparticles larger than 100 nm are cleared by the reticuloendothelial system28 while those smaller than 10 nm are rapidly cleared by the kidneys29. GNS take advantage of the EPR effect because they can be fabricated to have hydrodynamic sizes that fit well in the 10-100 nm size ranges. The SERS signal of accumulated GNS within each tumor and contralateral leg muscle was measured. The GNS were labeled with p-mercaptobenzoic acid as the Raman reporter. The unique SERS peaks of the SERS-labeled reporter on GNS were detected in the tumor but not in the contralateral muscle, illustrating selective absorption of GNS into tumors and demonstrating the possibility of using SERS for in vivo detection and differentiating tumor from normal muscle in mouse models19. The SERS signal from this SERS-encoded GNS platform can be detected in human skin grafts and in large animal models (live pigs), demonstrating the clinically relevant translational capabilities of the SERS technique for in vivo biosensing (Fig. 3)27. The use of SERS nanoprobes offers significant advantages for sensing and imaging as Raman probes do not suffer from photobleaching and photodegradation effects encountered in fluorescent probes.

JISS-17-1104-Fig3

Figure 3: SERS Spectra of Cy7 dye-labeled gold nanostars (GNS) embedded in porous scaffold and intradermally implanted in living pig dorsum (inset). The results demonstrated the possibility to monitor in vivo nanoprobes implanted under the skin by detecting the unique SERS spectra of Cy7 dye label. [Adapted from Reference 27]

As a principle, hyperthermia (HT), which is a treatment where heat is applied to a tumor or organ, aims to increase tumor temperature above physiologic body temperature with the goal of directly inducing cellular damage, as well as promote local and systemic antitumor immune effects. Conventionally, hyperthermia is delivered using microwave, radiofrequency, high-intensity focused ultrasound, or heat applicators. However, these methods are not suitable for deep-seated tumors and the heating distribution is often not well controlled. More importantly, these methods are only macroscopically confined to the tumor area but cannot target or ablate cancer cells at the microprecision scale. Nanoparticle-mediated thermal therapy has recently received increasing interest19,23,24,30-34. The ability to safely target single tumor cells with a high level of efficacy and specificity can be obtained with GNS. Their multiple sharp branches acting like “lightning rods” can convert safely and efficiently light into heat. We have performed a direct measurement of photothermal conversion efficiency for the 30-nm and 60-nm GNS, and we compared their efficiency to gold nanoshells, which are one of the most well-studied nanoparticles used for photothermal therapy. The results showed the temperature profiles for each of these three nanoparticles, with the 30-nm and 60-nm GNS having a much higher equilibrium temperature than nanoshells (34.7 °C) at equivalent optical density19. Rapid ablation can be achieved by GNS-mediated photothermal therapy by exploting the natural propensity of nanoparticles to extravasate the tumor vascular network and accumulate in and around cancer cells19. The significant reduction of the laser energy needed to precisely destroy the targeted cancer cells in which GNS preferentially accumulate due to the enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effect35. Fig. 4 shows images of mice before and after PTT with and without injected GNS. Note, the dramatic tumor size reduction due to PTT in the mouse injected with GNS19. Plasmonics-enhanced and optically modulated delivery of nanostars into brain tumor in live animals has been demonstrated in a murine model26; photothermal treatment on tumor vasculature may induce inflammasome activation, thus increasing the permeability of the blood brain-tumor barrier. Using nanostars functionalized with cell penetrating peptides to facilitate the intracellular delivery followed by irradiation with a femto-second pulsed laser, a successful in vivo photothermal therapy was achieved under an irradiance of 0.2 W/cm220, which is below the maximal permissible exposure of skin per ANSI regulation. These studies demonstrated that GNS have great potential for use in photothermal cancer therapy.

JISS-17-1104-Fig4

Figure 4: Photothermal therapy on sarcoma mice with (A) phosphate buffered saline (PBS) injection and (B) with intravenous GNS injection (B). The mice are shown before photothermlal treatment (PTT) and 3 days post PTT. [Adapted from Reference 19]

Immunotherapy has emerged as one of the most promising modalities to treat cancer. In recent years, immunotherapy with specific immune checkpoint inhibitor provides a promising way to break the tumor immunosuppressive environment37,38. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), a protein overexpressed on cancer cell membrane, contributes to the suppression of the immune system. PD-L1 binds to its receptor, PD-1, found on activated T cells, B cells, and myeloid cells, to modulate T cell function. The therapeutic anti-PD-L1 antibody is designed to block the PD-L1/PD-1 interaction and reverse tumor-mediated immunosuppression. Blocking the PD-L1/PD-1 axis has been shown to be highly beneficial in many human tumors and used as a cancer treatment modality>39-43. However, current antibodies work only for a limited number of patients and can become ineffective with time.

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy with GNS-mediated photothermal therapy has produced an effective two-pronged treatment modality referred to as Synergistic Immuno Photo Nanotherapy (SYMPHONY), which is designed to treat both primary and secondary tumor cells44. The efficacy of SYMPHONY is based on several synergistic processes (Fig. 5). First, localized PTT with GNS and NIR irradiation is used to kill primary tumor cells. Upon GNS-PTT treatment, dying tumor cells after thermal ablation could release tumor associated antigens (TAAs), damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs), heat shock proteins (HSPs), etc. In live cells DAMPs are intracellular molecules that are normally hidden. When cells are damaged or dying, DAMPS are released and acquire immunostimulatory properties. DAMPS have been shown to exert various effects on antigen-presenting cells (APCs), such as maturation, activation and antigen processing/presentation45. APCs, which are present in the tissue or in local draining lymph nodes, process the tumor antigens and present tumor-derived peptides to T cells. Combining anti-PD-L1 treatment with tumor antigen presentation will activate tumor-specific T cells that will attack both the primary and distant/metastatic cancer cells. This is particularly important in the primary tumor bed, hypoxic-oxygenated boundary, where it is believed metastatic/ differentiating/proliferating potential is maximum. Mouse studies have revealed that the two-pronged therapeutic approach, combining immune-checkpoint inhibition and GNS–mediated photothermal therapy, was effective in destroying primary treated tumors as well as untreated distant tumors in mice implanted with the MB49 bladder cancer cell line44. The effect of the combination of plasmonic GNS-enabled photothermal ablation and PD-L1 immunomodulation was demonstrated to be synergistic and not just additive. Furthermore, the delayed rechallenge with repeated MB49 tumor injections into cured mice did not lead to new tumor formation, indicating that the combined treatment induced effective long-lasting immunity, i.e. an anticancer ‘vaccine’ effect44,46.

JISS-17-1104-Fig5

Figure 5: Synergistic Immuno Photo Nanotherapy (SYMPHONY) Modality to treat metastatic cancer [Adapted from Reference 44]

Plasmonics–active gold nanostars provide an excellent multifunctional platform with capabilities spanning multi-modality sensing (SERS, TPL CT, MRI, PET) and therapy (PTT, PDT and immunotherapy). Due to their desirable features including the lack of photobleaching and photodegradation, narrow spectral fingerprints, and their capability to allow multiplexed bioanalysis, GNS will open new opportunities to important theranostics applications. GNS have a tunable plasmonic band in the near infrared region, where there is low tissue absorption and autofluorescence, and therefore they are quite suitable for in vivo applications. Furthermore, the combination of checkpoint blockade immunotherapy with GNS-mediated photothermal therapy offers the promise to address one of the most challenging problems in the treatment of metastatic cancer and ultimately producing an effective treatment capable of inducing effective long-lasting immunity against cancer.

Gold nanostars is a versatile platform showing great promise for cancer management. The following directions could be further pursued to improve cancer imaging and treatment using GNS. In addition to passive targeting via the EPR effect, future studies can investigate active targeting using peptides or antibodies linked to GNS in order to improve tumor uptake. Of special interest is the synergistic combinatorial approach such as SYMPHONY that can reverse tumor-mediated immunosuppression, showing promise to treat not only unresectable primary tumors, but also distant cancer metastasis by enhancing the systemic activity of specific and adaptive immune responses and inducing an anticancer “vaccine” effect. Further studies will provide better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the novel synergistic treatment modalities of SYMPHONY in order to enhance and broaden the effect of immune-checkpoint inhibitors for successful eradication of metastatic cancer. Identifying, characterizing and investigating the specific immune cells and molecular processes involved in this synergistic interaction will pave the way for successful treatment of locally advanced and metastatic cancer, and recurring tumors.

ANSI: American National Standards Institute

APCs: antigen-presenting cells

CT: computed tomography

DAMPs: damage-associated molecular pattern molecules

EM: electromagnetic

EPR: enhanced permeability and retention

GNS: gold nanostars:

HSPs: heat shock proteins

HT: hyperthermia

MRI: magnetic resonance imaging

NIR: near infrared (NIR)

PD-L1: programmed death-ligand 1

PTT: photothermal therapy

ROS: reactive oxygen species

SERS: surface-enhanced Raman scattering

SYMPHONY: Synergistic Immuno Photothermal Nanotherapy

TAA: tumor-associated antigen

TPL: two-photon photoluminescence

This research is based upon work supported by the National Institutes of Health (1R21CA196426) and by the Duke Faculty Exploratory Research Fund.

  1. Vo-Dinh T, Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy using metallic nanostructures. TrAC-Trends Anal Chem. 1998; 17: 557-582.
  2. Dhawan A, Norton SJ, Gerhold MD, et al. Comparison of FDTD numerical computations and analytical multipole expansion method for plasmonics-active nanosphere dimers. Optics Express. 2009; 17: 9688-9703.
  3. Khoury CG, Norton SJ, Vo-Dinh T. Plasmonics of 3-D nanoshell dimers using multipole expansion and finite element method. ACS Nano. 2009; 3: 2776-2788.
  4. Norton SJ, Vo-Dinh T. Plasmonic Resonances of Nanoshells of Spheroidal Shape, IEEE Trans. Nanotechnology. 2007; 6: 627-6.
  5. Norton SJ, Vo-Dinh T. Optical response of linear chains of metal nanospheres and nanospheroids. J Opt Soc Amer. 2008; 25: 2767.
  6. Norton SJ, Vo-Dinh T. Spectral bounds on plasmon resonances for Ag and Au prolate and oblate nanospheroids. J Nanophotonics. 2008; 2: 029501.
  7. Norton SJ, Vo-Dinh T. Plasmonics enhancement of a luminescent or Raman-active layer in a multilayered metallic nanoshell. Applied Optics. 2009; 48: 5040-5049.
  8. Vo-Dinh T, Dhawan A, Norton SJ, et al. Plasmonic nanoparticles and nanowires: design, fabrication and application in sensing. J Phys Chem C. 2010; 114: 7480-7488.
  9. Yuan H, Fales AM, Khoury CG, et al. Spectral characterization and intracellular detection of Surface?Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS)?encoded plasmonic gold nanostars. J Raman Spectrosc. 2013; 44: 234-239.
  10. Bello JM, Narayanan VA, Stokes DL, et al. Fiber-optic remote sensor for in situ surface-enhanced Raman scattering analysis. Anal Chem. 1990; 62: 2437-2441.
  11. Wang HN, Vo-Dinh T. Multiplex detection of breast cancer biomarkers using plasmonic molecular sentinel nanoprobes. Nanotechnology. 2009; 20: 065101.
  12. Wabuyele MB, Vo-Dinh T. Detection of HIV Type 1 DNA sequence Using Plasmonics Nanoprobes. Anal Chem. 2005; 77: 7810-7815.
  13. Ngo HT, Wang HN, Fales AM, et al. Label-free DNA biosensor based on SERS molecular sentinel on nanowave chip. Anal Chem. 2013; 85 (13): 6378-6383.
  14. Vo-Dinh T, Wang HNScaffidi J. Plasmonic Nanoprobes for SERS Biosensing and Bioimaging. J Biophotonics. 2010; 3: 89–102.
  15. Vo-Dinh T, Fales AM, Griffin GD, et al. Plasmonic nanoprobes: from chemical sensing to medical diagnostics and therapy, Nanoscale. 2013; 5: 10127-10140.
  16. Vo-Dinh T, Liu Y, Fales AM, et al. SERS Nanosensors and Nanoreporters: Golden Opportunities in Biomedical Applications. WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology. 2015; 7: 17-33.
  17. Wang HN, Fales AM, Vo-Dinh T. Plasmonics-based SERS nanobiosensor for homogeneous nucleic acid detection, Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 2015; 11 (4): 511-520.
  18. Wang HN, Crawford BM, Fales AM, et al. Multiplexed Detection of MicroRNA Biomarkers Using SERS-based Inverse Molecular Sentinel (iMS) Nanoprobes”. J Phys Chem C. 2016; 120 (37): pp 21047–21055.
  19. Liu Y, Ashton JR, Moding EJ, et al. A plasmonic gold nanostar theranostic probe for in vivo tumor imaging and photothermal therapy. Theranostics. 2015; 5(9): 946-960.
  20. Yuan H, Khoury CG, Wilson CM, et al. In vivo particle tracking and photothermal ablation using plasmon-resonant gold nanostars. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine. 2012; 8(8): 1355-63.
  21. Yuan H, Khoury CG, Hwang H, et al. Gold nanostars: surfactant-free synthesis, 3D modelling, and two-photon photoluminescence imaging. Nanotechnology. 2012; 23(7): 075102.
  22. Khoury C, Vo-Dinh T. Gold Nanostars For Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering: Synthesis, Characterization and Optimization. J Phys Chem C. 2008; 112(48): 18849-18859.
  23. Yuan H, Fales AM, Vo-Dinh T. TAT peptide-functionalized gold nanostars: enhanced intracellular delivery and efficient NIR photothermal therapy using ultralow irradiance. J Am Chem Soc. 2012; 134(28): 11358-61.
  24. Yuan H, Khoury CG, Wilson CM, et al. In vivo particle tracking and photothermal ablation using plasmon-resonant gold nanostars. Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine. 2012; 8(8): 1355-63.
  25. Liu Y, Chang Z, Yuan H, et al. Quintuple-modality (SERS-MRI-CT-TPL-PTT) plasmonic nanoprobe for theranostics. Nanoscale. 2013; 5(24): 12126-12131.
  26. Yuan H, Wilson CM, Xia J, et al. Plasmonics enhanced and optically modulated delivery of gold nanostars into brain tumor. Nanoscale. 2014; 6: 4078-4082.
  27. Register JK, AM Fales H, Wang EH, et al. “In Vivo Detection of SERS-Encoded Plasmonic Nanostars in Small and Large Animal Models”. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015; 407 (27): 8215-8224.
  28. Vinogradov SV, Bronich TK, Kabanov AV. Nanosized cationic hydrogels for drug delivery: preparation, properties and interactions with cells. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002; 54: 135–147.
  29. Ilium L, Davis SS, Wilson CG, et al. Blood clearance and organ deposition of intravenously administered colloidal particles. The effects of particle size, nature and shape. Int J Pharm. 1982; 12: 135–146.
  30. Loo C, Lin A, Hirsch L, et al. Nanoshell-enabled photonics-based imaging and therapy of cancer. Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment. 2004; (1): 33-40.
  31. Takada T, Yamashita T, Sato M, et al. Growth inhibition of re-challenge B16 melanoma transplant by conjugates of melanogenesis substrate and magnetite nanoparticles as the basis for developing melanoma-targeted chemo-thermo-immunotherapy. J Biomed Biotechnol, Volume 2009, Article ID 457936.
  32. Koning GA, Eggermont AMM, Lindner LH, et al. Hyperthermia and Thermosensitive Liposomes for Improved Delivery of Chemotherapeutic Drugs to Solid Tumors. Pharmaceutical Research. 2010; 27(8):1750-1754.
  33. Wang C, Xu L, Chao Liang, et al. Immunological Responses Triggered by Photothermal Therapy with Carbon Nanotubes in Combination with Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy to Inhibit Cancer Metastasis. Advanced Materials. 2014; 26(48): 8154-8162.
  34. Kennedy LC, Bickford LR, Lewinski NA, et al. A New Era for Cancer Treatment: Gold-Nanoparticle-Mediated Thermal Therapies. Small. 2011; 7(2): 169-83.
  35. Maeda H. The enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumor vasculature: the key role of tumor-selective macromolecular drug targeting. Adv Enzyme Regul. 2001; 41: 189-207.
  36. Fales AM, Yuan H, Vo-Dinh T. Silica-coated gold nanostars for combined surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) detection and singlet-oxygen generation: A potential nanoplatform for theranostics. Langmuir. 2011; 27: 12186-12190.
  37. Chen DS, Mellman I. "Oncology Meets Immunology: The Cancer-Immunity Cycle." Immunity. 2013; 39(1): 1-10.
  38. Pardoll DM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2012; 12: 252–264.
  39. Inman BA, Sebo TJ, Frigola X, et al. PD-L1 (B7-H1) expression by urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and BCG-induced granulomata: associations with localized stage progression. Cancer. 2007; 109(8): 1499-1505.
  40. Bellmunt J, Mullane SA, Werner L, et al. Association of PD-L1 expression on tumor-infiltrating mononuclear cells and overall survival in patients with urothelial carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2015; 26(4): 812-817.
  41. Inman BA, Frigola X, Dong H, et al. Costimulation, coinhibition and cancer. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2007; 7(1): 15-30.
  42. Inman BA, Longo TA, Ramalingam S et al. Atezolizumab: A PD-L1–Blocking Antibody for Bladder Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017; 23(8): 1886-1890.
  43. Chowdhury F, Dunn S, Mitchell S, et al. PD-L1 and CD8(+)PD1(+) lymphocytes exist as targets in the pediatric tumor microenvironment for immunomodulatory therapy. Oncoimmunology. 2015; 4(10): 8.
  44. Liu Y, Maccarini P, Palmer GM, et al. Synergistic Immuno Photothermal Nanotherapy (SYMPHONY) for the Treatment of Unresec-table and Metastatic Cancers. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7: 8606.
  45. Garg AD, Nowis D, Golab J, et al. Immunogenic cell death, DAMPs and anticancer therapeutics: an emerging amalgamation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010; 1805(1): 53-71.
  46. Vo-Dinh T, Inman BA. What potential does plasmonics-amplified synergistic immuno photothermal nanotherapy have for treatment of cancer. Nanomedicine. 2018; 13 (2): 139-144.
 

Article Info

Article Notes

  • Published on: January 2, 2018

Keywords

  • Immunotherapy

  • Immune checkpoint
  • Hyperthermia
  • Plasmonics
  • Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)
  • Cancer

*Correspondence:

Dr. Tuan Vo-Dinh
Fitzpatrick Institute for Photonics, Department of Biomedical Engineering
Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0281, USA
Email: tuan.vodinh@duke.edu

© 2018 Vo-Dinh T. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.